| The question still remains, why does the main stream media not cover this? Older video from You Tube from May 2010. Long, but worth watching to the end. |
From the site: The video starts out with some content from obamasnippets.com, which, of course is contrived. And yet, there seems to be a synthetic truth about what the president says. Is he "natural born" according to the Constitution? No. The requirement is that BOTH parents need to be U. S. Citizens. Two U. S. Citizen parents produce a "natural born" citizen. It's likely that Mr. Obama was REGISTERED in Hawaii, therefore he has a COLB from Hawaii. The truth may well be he was born in Kenya; that is where we believe his "long-form" birth certificate was issued. Nevertheless, "natural born" indicates, and speaks to the fact that BOTH parents have to be U. S. Citizens. His father WAS NEVER a U. S. Citizen, therefore, Barack Hussein Obama is NOT a "natural born" Citizen of the United States, thus he is in violation of Amendment 14, and Article II, Section 1, Paragraph 5 of the United States Constitution.
6 comments:
Re: "Two U. S. Citizen parents produce a "natural born" citizen. '
Who told you that? It is wrong. The original meaning of Natural Born, the one that applies to Obama, is simply "born in the country." It was a synonym for natural born, which was not a popular phrase at the time that the Constitution was written. Natural Born was used all the time, and it was always used in AMERICA (not Switizerland) to indicate citizenship due to the place of birth, not due to the parents.
That is why all 535 members of the US Congress voted to confirm Obama's election. If even one of them had thought that your theory about two parents was true, the vote would not have been unanimous. And the US Supreme Court has turned down every single birther lawsuit, and it only takes four justices to call a case.
"Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity."---William Rawle, A VIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 2d ed. (1829)
“Natural born citizen. Persons who are born within the jurisdiction of a national government, i.e. in its territorial limits, or those born of citizens temporarily residing abroad.” — Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition
“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]
The mainstream media HAS covered it.
Here is what the Wall Street Journal said:
"Obama has already provided a legal birth certificate demonstrating that he was born in Hawaii. No one has produced any serious evidence to the contrary. Absent such evidence, it is unreasonable to deny that Obama has met the burden of proof. We know that he was born in Honolulu as surely as we know that Bill Clinton was born in Hope, Ark., or George W. Bush in New Haven, Conn."
http://roach1958.wordpress.com/2010/03/16/expose-obot-smrstrauss-finally-unmasked/
http://jeffersonsrebels.blogspot.com/2010/03/smrstrauss-total-reveal-their-tangled.html
None of that is true.
But the fact that Obama was born in Hawaii and has proven it IS TRUE, and the facts on his official birth certificate were confirmed by three Republican officials in Hawaii.
And there were notices of his birth in Hawaii newspapers in 1961, and they were not ads because the Hawaii newspapers did not accept birth ads at the time, but only took their notices from the government. And Hawaii did not accept "walk in" registrations but demanded a witness statement whenever there was a claim that a child was born outside of a hospital.
http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2009/01/09/whats-an-obot/
Post a Comment